LBO Model Walkthrough: Sources & Uses, Debt Schedule, IRR Math
A complete walkthrough of an LBO model: building the sources and uses table, modeling debt schedule with mandatory and optional repayments, projecting cash flows, and computing the sponsor's IRR and money-multiple at exit.
What You'll Learn
- โBuild a sources and uses table that balances
- โModel term loan, revolver, and mezzanine debt with interest and amortization
- โProject free cash flow and apply mandatory + optional debt repayment
- โCompute exit equity value and sponsor IRR / MOIC
1. Direct Answer: How an LBO Works in Numbers
An LBO is a transaction where a financial sponsor (private equity firm) buys a company using a high proportion of debt โ typically 60-80% of the purchase price. The sponsor's equity check is the remainder. Over the holding period (usually 5-7 years), the company uses operating cash flow to pay down debt. At exit, the sponsor sells the company. The equity value at exit is enterprise value minus remaining debt โ and because debt has been paid down, the equity value is much higher than the initial equity check, even if enterprise value is similar. IRR comes from three drivers: EBITDA growth, multiple expansion, and debt paydown. The mechanics: sources = uses (cash and debt raised = price paid plus fees); debt schedule tracks interest and amortization year by year; free cash flow goes to mandatory debt repayment first, then to optional 'cash sweep' on revolving credit; at exit, apply exit multiple to terminal EBITDA, subtract net debt, and that's the equity proceeds for the sponsor.
Key Points
- โขDebt typically 60-80% of total purchase price
- โขIRR drivers: EBITDA growth, multiple expansion, debt paydown
- โขSources and uses must balance: cash raised = price + fees
- โขFCF goes to mandatory then optional debt repayment in waterfall
- โขExit equity = EV at exit โ remaining net debt
2. Step 1: Build the Sources and Uses Table
The S&U table is where every LBO model starts. Sources is where the money comes from; Uses is where it goes. **Uses:** - Equity purchase price (= enterprise value at entry minus net debt assumed = pure equity check to seller) - Debt refinancing (any existing debt being refinanced or repaid at close) - Transaction fees (advisory, financing, legal โ typically 2-4% of EV) - Minimum cash on balance sheet at close (often $20-50M for liquidity buffer) **Sources:** - New debt raised (sum of term loan, revolver draw at close, mezzanine, etc.) - Sponsor equity (the PE firm's check) - Rollover equity (if management or existing holders are rolling some equity) - Cash on balance sheet at close (acquired company's existing cash, if available to fund the transaction) Balance check: total sources = total uses. They MUST balance โ if they don't, you have an arithmetic error or missing line item. **Worked example.** Target enterprise value: $500M. Existing net debt: $100M. Cash on B/S: $20M (used). Equity purchase price: $400M. Transaction fees: $15M. Minimum cash post-close: $25M. Uses: $400M (equity) + $100M (refi existing debt) + $15M (fees) + $25M (cash) = $540M. Sources at 60% leverage on EV (i.e., $300M of debt): $300M debt + $20M cash from B/S + sponsor equity (the plug). Sponsor equity = $540M โ $300M โ $20M = $220M. Leverage ratio: $300M / $80M EBITDA = 3.75x EBITDA. Sponsor equity to total: 41% of EV.
Key Points
- โขSources = Uses must balance to the dollar
- โขEquity purchase price = EV โ net debt assumed (or refinanced)
- โขTransaction fees: typically 2-4% of EV
- โขMinimum cash on B/S post-close: $20-50M typical
- โขSponsor equity = total uses โ total non-equity sources
3. Step 2: Model the Debt Schedule
After the S&U, build a multi-year debt schedule for each tranche. **Term Loan B (TLB)** is the most common LBO debt: typically 6-7 year maturity, ~1% mandatory annual amortization, with a cash flow sweep on excess cash. Pricing in 2026: SOFR + 350-500 bps. Senior secured. **Revolver:** undrawn at close (or partially drawn). Used for working capital. Typically 5-year, undrawn fee 50 bps, drawn rate SOFR + 250-400 bps. **Mezzanine / Subordinated:** higher cost, longer maturity, often PIK-toggle (pays interest in cash or new principal). Pricing 10-13% in 2026. For each tranche, model year-by-year: - Beginning balance - Mandatory amortization - Cash sweep / voluntary paydown - New issuances (rare except for working capital revolver draws) - Ending balance - Interest expense (typically on average balance) **Cash sweep mechanics:** TLBs typically include a cash sweep โ required prepayment from excess cash flow at certain leverage levels. Above 4.5x leverage: 75% sweep. 4.0-4.5x: 50% sweep. 3.5-4.0x: 25% sweep. Below 3.5x: 0% sweep. **Circular reference**: interest expense affects net income, which affects free cash flow, which affects debt paydown, which affects interest expense. Excel handles this with iterative calculations enabled (File > Options > Formulas > Enable iterative calculation, max 100 iterations).
Key Points
- โขTerm Loan B: 6-7 year, ~1% mandatory amortization, cash sweep mechanic
- โขRevolver: 5-year, mostly for working capital
- โขMezzanine: higher cost (10-13%), often PIK-toggle
- โขInterest typically calculated on average balance (BoP + EoP)/2
- โขIterative calculations needed in Excel for circular references
4. Step 3: Build the Three-Statement Projection
Project the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement for the holding period (usually 5-7 years). **Revenue:** typically 5-15% growth assumption based on prior performance and management plan. **EBITDA margin:** project margin path. LBO sponsors often model 100-300 bps of margin improvement over the hold period from operational improvements and cost cuts. **EBITDA = Revenue ร Margin.** This is the key metric for valuation and debt service. **D&A:** project as percent of revenue or capex (varies by industry). **EBIT = EBITDA โ D&A.** **Interest expense** comes from the debt schedule (above). **Taxes:** apply effective tax rate to pre-tax income. NOLs from acquisition can shelter taxes in early years. **Net income = (EBIT โ Interest) ร (1 โ tax rate).** **Free cash flow** = Net Income + D&A โ CapEx โ Change in WC ยฑ non-recurring items. FCF flows into the cash flow statement, where it's allocated to: 1. Mandatory debt amortization (first claim) 2. Cash sweep on TLB (per leverage formula) 3. Cash on balance sheet (any remainder) No dividends to sponsor during hold period (rare exceptions for dividend recaps).
Key Points
- โขProject revenue, EBITDA margin, D&A, capex, working capital
- โขSponsors often assume margin improvement during hold (100-300 bps)
- โขFCF waterfall: mandatory amortization, then cash sweep, then cash B/S
- โขUse prior year for working capital changes assumption
- โขNOLs from acquisition can shelter early-year taxes
5. Step 4: Calculate Exit Value and Sponsor Returns
At exit (year 5-7), apply an exit multiple to terminal EBITDA to get exit enterprise value: Exit EV = Exit EBITDA ร Exit Multiple The exit multiple is typically: - Same as entry multiple (constant multiple assumption โ most common conservative approach) - Slightly higher (multiple expansion if market has improved or company has scaled) - Slightly lower (multiple contraction if market has deteriorated) Exit Equity = Exit EV โ Net Debt at Exit + Cash at Exit Sponsor Equity Proceeds = Exit Equity ร (Sponsor's Ownership %). IRR Calculation: IRR is the discount rate that sets PV of cash flows equal to zero. For sponsor: initial investment is the equity check (negative cash flow at year 0). Equity proceeds at exit (year 5-7) is the positive cash flow. With no interim distributions, IRR = (Exit Proceeds / Equity Check)^(1/years) โ 1. MOIC (Multiple of Invested Capital): Exit Proceeds / Equity Check. This is the simpler metric โ '2.5x' means sponsor doubled and a half their money. Worked example continued. Entry: $80M EBITDA ร 6.25x = $500M EV. Sponsor equity: $220M. Year 5 exit: $120M EBITDA (8.4% revenue CAGR, 100 bps margin expansion) ร 6.25x (constant multiple) = $750M exit EV. Net debt at exit: $250M (paid down from $300M). Cash at exit: $40M. Equity at exit: $750M โ $250M + $40M = $540M. Sponsor proceeds: $540M (assume 100% sponsor ownership for simplicity). MOIC: $540M / $220M = 2.45x. IRR: ($540M / $220M)^(1/5) โ 1 = (2.45)^0.2 โ 1 = 0.196 = 19.6% IRR. IRR โฅ20% is typically the sponsor's target.
Key Points
- โขExit EV = Terminal EBITDA ร Exit Multiple
- โขConstant multiple assumption is most defensible / conservative
- โขExit Equity = Exit EV โ Net Debt + Cash
- โขMOIC = Exit Proceeds / Equity Check (simpler metric)
- โขSponsor IRR target: typically 20%+
6. Step 5: Decompose IRR Into Drivers (Returns Attribution)
A clean LBO model decomposes IRR into the three sources of value creation: 1. **EBITDA growth (operational improvement):** the company is bigger at exit because of revenue growth, margin expansion, or both. 2. **Multiple expansion (multiple arbitrage):** sold for a higher multiple than purchased. 3. **Debt paydown (financial engineering):** equity grew because debt was paid off, so a constant EV translates into more equity at exit. Formula approach: - Equity if no debt paydown, no growth, no multiple change = entry equity. (Floor โ IRR contribution = 0) - Equity if debt paydown only = entry EV โ exit net debt. Difference vs entry equity = debt paydown contribution. - Equity if growth only (no paydown, no multiple change) = entry multiple ร exit EBITDA โ entry net debt. Difference = growth contribution. - Equity at exit (full) = exit multiple ร exit EBITDA โ exit net debt. Difference vs growth-only case = multiple expansion. Worked example for our case: - Entry equity: $220M. - If no growth, no multiple change, $50M debt paydown: equity = $500M โ $250M = $250M. Debt paydown contribution: $30M. - If growth (to $120M EBITDA) at constant 6.25x and no debt paydown: equity = $750M โ $300M = $450M. Growth contribution: $200M. - Full exit equity: $540M. Multiple expansion: $0 (we held multiple constant). Sum check: $220M + $30M + $200M + $0 = $450M โ $540M. The $90M gap is the interaction effect of growth + paydown. In this example, growth is the dominant return driver โ typical of high-quality LBOs. Multiple-expansion-driven LBOs are riskier because exit conditions are out of management's control.
Key Points
- โขDecompose IRR into: EBITDA growth, multiple expansion, debt paydown
- โขGrowth-driven returns are higher quality than multiple expansion
- โขMultiple expansion depends on market conditions at exit (uncertain)
- โขDebt paydown is the leveraged equity story โ works when EV holds steady
- โขSensitivity-test exit multiple, growth rate, and exit timing
7. How FinanceIQ Helps With LBO Models
Provide entry purchase price, EBITDA, multiple, debt structure (term loan, revolver, mezzanine size and rates), assumptions on revenue growth and margin, and exit assumptions. FinanceIQ produces a sources and uses table, multi-year debt schedule with mandatory and optional repayments, three-statement projections, exit waterfall, sponsor IRR/MOIC, and IRR attribution to growth, multiple expansion, and debt paydown. Useful for IB and PE interview prep โ LBO models are a standard technical interview question and the build process is testable.
Key Points
- โขGenerates S&U from purchase price and capital structure inputs
- โขBuilds debt schedule with cash sweep mechanics
- โขComputes IRR and MOIC at exit
- โขDecomposes IRR into the three return drivers
- โขUseful for IB/PE interview LBO modeling questions
8. Common Mistakes in LBO Models
**Mistake 1: Sources and Uses don't balance.** Always cross-check the totals. Plug or unbalance hides somewhere โ find and fix it before building the rest. **Mistake 2: Forgetting transaction fees in Uses.** Fees are 2-4% of EV โ that's $10-20M on a $500M deal, and forgetting them throws off the equity check by the same amount. **Mistake 3: Not enabling iterative calculations.** Excel requires iterative calculation enabled (Options > Formulas) to handle the interest/debt circular reference. Without it, you get a #NUM error or zero. Enable iterations + max iterations 100 + max change 0.001. **Mistake 4: Using too-high entry multiple with constant exit multiple.** A 12x entry multiple held constant requires massive EBITDA growth or debt paydown to clear a 20% IRR. Sanity-check: at constant multiple, your IRR comes from EBITDA growth and debt paydown only, and that's a tougher mountain than at lower entry multiples. **Mistake 5: Ignoring management options/equity rollover dilution.** Management often gets 5-10% equity in LBOs (option pool or rollover). This dilutes sponsor's exit proceeds. Failing to model this overstates sponsor IRR by 1-3%. **Mistake 6: Constant working capital assumption.** Working capital scales with revenue. As the company grows, working capital investment increases, reducing free cash flow. Project working capital as a percent of revenue, not in absolute dollars. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing involves significant risk.
Key Points
- โขAlways cross-check Sources = Uses
- โขDon't forget transaction fees (2-4% of EV)
- โขEnable Excel iterative calculations for debt circularity
- โขSanity-check entry multiple vs IRR target
- โขModel management equity rollover (5-10% typical)
Key Takeaways
- โ LBO debt typically 60-80% of total purchase price
- โ TLB pricing 2026: SOFR + 350-500 bps, 1% mandatory amortization
- โ Cash sweep tiers: 75% above 4.5x leverage, 50% at 4.0-4.5x, 25% at 3.5-4.0x
- โ Sponsor IRR target: 20%+ over 5-7 year hold
- โ MOIC target: 2.5-3.0x typical for mid-market LBOs
- โ Exit assumption: constant multiple is most defensible
- โ IRR drivers: EBITDA growth (best), debt paydown (good), multiple expansion (riskiest)
- โ Management equity rollover: 5-10% typical
Practice Questions
1. Entry EV = $400M, EBITDA = $50M, debt = $250M. Compute leverage and equity check.
2. Entry equity $200M, exit equity $440M, 5-year hold. Compute MOIC and IRR.
3. If exit multiple equals entry multiple and EBITDA is flat, where does sponsor IRR come from?
4. What's the impact of multiple expansion vs multiple contraction on IRR?
FAQs
Common questions about this topic
A dividend recapitalization is when the LBO sponsor refinances the company partway through the hold period to issue new debt and use the proceeds for a special dividend to themselves. Effectively returns part of the equity check to the sponsor before exit, accelerating IRR. Dividend recaps depend on a strong credit market and reasonable company performance. They add complexity to the model but can substantially improve sponsor returns.
20% has been the rough industry standard for decades and roughly matches what PE LPs (limited partners โ pension funds, endowments) require to justify the illiquidity, fees, and risk of private equity. With management fees (2% per year) and carried interest (20% of profits above hurdle), the LP needs net returns of 12-15% to make PE worthwhile vs public equities. 20% gross IRR translates to roughly that net return. In a tougher fundraising environment, target IRRs may rise to 22-25%.
IRR accounts for the time value of money โ earlier cash flows are worth more. Cash-on-Cash return (also called MOIC) is just total proceeds / total invested capital, ignoring time. A 2.5x MOIC over 3 years (35% IRR) is much better than 2.5x MOIC over 7 years (14% IRR). LPs care about both โ IRR measures the speed of the return, MOIC measures the magnitude.
Yes. Provide deal parameters (entry multiple, EBITDA, debt structure, assumptions) and FinanceIQ produces a complete LBO model โ sources and uses, debt schedule, three-statement projection, exit waterfall, IRR, MOIC, and returns attribution. Useful for IB and PE interview prep where LBO models are a standard technical question. This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.